Agenda
- Housekeeping
- Lecture/Discussion
- Book Review Discussion
- Project Discussion
Housekeeping
- Gradesheet
- Reading essays: Elise (Starbucks and Christensen), Joanna (illustrated, clearly linked theories to personal experience), Josh (Rogers & Twitter), Tarja (pop culture and theories), Teri (personal experience)
Lecture/Discussion
- Lecture (PPT/Slideshare)
Media
- It Happened One Night (1934)
* “Scoop”
* $2.60 (1934) -> $43.36 (2011)
Resources
- Computer Generations
* Mechanical
* Vacuum Tubes
* Solid State Transitor
* Integrated Circuits (Intel)
* Microprocessor - What does “solid state” mean in relation to electronics?
Electricity as the medium of information exchange (on/off)
Discussion Leaders
Week 1: Lisa, Mike, Rachael, Ruba, Zanna
Process: we’ll count off, 1-5. Peer teaching/discussion commences. Then presenters stay seated, students rotate. We’ll do this at least three times. Then we’ll come back as a group for thematic discussion.
- What role do social media play in the innovation-decision process described by Rogers?
- Thinking about hard drive technology, what are some emerging technologies, how disruptive are they, and what long term potential do they have?
Everyone should provide commentary/feedback on two DL blog posts: one that you heard and one that you didn’t. DLs have a breather. :-)
Thinking About Presentations
- Lecture (PPT/Slideshare)
- Working in pairs, search Slideshare.net and find at least one “good” and one “bad” example presentation related to course topics or your research topics. Please comment on this post with your examples (links!) and a short explanation. Tell me the names of the folks in the pair, please. :-)
- General discussion : why did you pick those presentations?
Book Review Discussion
I’m making the assumption that (almost) everyone has read /part/ of their book. For this discussion:
- How has the book changed (or reinforced) your perceptions of your research topic?
- How might you incorporate this info into your project paper?
- How does the book illustrate theories we’re talking about in class?
- Be sure to include basic info (title, author, when published). Usually this is at the beginning or the end of the review.
- We are more interested in analysis than summary, but you need to provide enough summary so that someone who has not read the book ‘gets’ the points you are going to make — don’t spend a lot of time (words) on info that you aren’t going to critique!
- Analyze what author got right/wrong if there are future projections
- Focus on implications for your research area
- Be sure to make a recommendation in your closing graph (e.g., who should or should not read the book and why; if it should be part of your library or recycled through HalfPrice Books; whether this book makes you more or less likely to read something else by the same author)
- The audience for this review is “the world” not “the class”
Project Proposals
- General feedback : no clear statement of “past-present-future”
- General feedback : many people shared a popular, not scholarly source
- General feedback : remember to spell check/grammar check
Project “buddies”:
- Adv/Mkt: Mike, Navni, Teri
- Biz: Lara, Mandy, Tarja
- Community: Karen, Lisa, Rachael
- Entertainment: Evan, Josh
- Finance : Joanna, Zanna
- Media: Cathy, Derek, Louise, Madeline, Ting (break into two groups!)
- Mobile: Coco, Corey
- Music: Elise, Eric
- Politics: Ruba, Thor
- Tech In “Space” : Dominique, Jackie
Assignments
- Regular weekly reading assignment
- Discussion Leader extra-credit oppty: reflection on experience by Friday – see assignments page
- Book review due Tu 26 April at noon
- Discussion Leaders
Presentation: Maximum of seven (7) slides including title and closing credit/contact. All will be shared on Slideshare.net
DL Group 2: Cathy,Elise, Evan, Navni, Thor
Advertisement
Comments
Supervening Social Necessity Discussion
* Gap in society that motivates innovation … telegraph and how railroad really helped spur its development
* Confusion – was was social necessity for Twitter – easier looking back (hindsight) – “the need to be heard/or know about anything ASAP” – why it’s different (constraint -> 140) -> Madeline (# of people using SMS on their phones) — map of early days (people wanted to know what was going on in other places of the world)
* Medical devices -> ultrasound tech – 10 yrs ago not common to find out sex of baby now you get beautiful pictures – cultural expectation for some families
* transportation -> supervening social necessity (fuel)
* telegraph made quality of life better (sped up communication) … harder to escape crime
* society’s pressure to create a technology – iPad -> tech will fit into cellphone sized device “always connected” but cellphone too small
* War effort -> decoding messages / Cold War – what is the present “cold war”
* A want or condition builds to the point that it becomes a requirement -> digital foreign language translation
* Facebook -> communication -> desire not to get BS or commercial messages (noise) explains FF Flash Block
* Tipping point – where so many people adopt a new technology that network effects overwhelm laggards
* Hard drives reading -> smaller in size but computers weren’t yet getting smaller
* social problems needing to be facilitated by new tech. Smartphones -> driven by a desire always on
Here is a great presentation on transmedia: http://www.slideshare.net/socialcreature/your-life-is-a-transmedia-experience-6609259
Here is a terrible presentation on transmedia: http://www.slideshare.net/cscolari/transmedia-storytelling-narrative-strategies-fictional-worlds-and-branding-in-contemporary-media-production
Coco and Karen:
Bad: http://www.slideshare.net/Stutts/10-trends-to-watch-in-2010
Too much copy. Very small images. Page layout is busy.
Good: http://www.slideshare.net/netlash/old-media-vs-new-media
Use of negative space. Use of emotive pictures. Simple illustrations. Rule of thirds. Some resonate humor.
Two SlideShare Links:
The Good One:
http://www.slideshare.net/jeffadelsonyan/the-new-new-media-2011
The Better One:
http://www.slideshare.net/tedpersson/fck-digital-digital-is-dead
Navni Garg & Ting Kang
Joanna & Mike, topic is the stock market for both:
Bad example: Too much text, too many colors, too many ideas going on at once. Easy to get lost.
http://www.slideshare.net/real_estate/how-selling-is-done-1471050
Good example: Not too much text, clear font, energetic, each slide had one main point. Easy to stay focused.
http://www.slideshare.net/thinkingcarl/average-is-not-normal-presentation
Two SlideShare Links:
The Good One:
http://www.slideshare.net/jeffadelsonyan/the-new-new-media-2011
The Better One:
http://www.slideshare.net/tedpersson/fck-digital-digital-is-dead
Clean Graphics and Text , Engaging, Clear
The Horrible One:
http://www.slideshare.net/frogdesign/digital-trends-for-media
Unclear, Too much text and very graphic images
Navni Garg & Ting Kang
Josh and Lisa:
Good example: http://www.slideshare.net/coolstuff/the-brand-gap
Simple, concepts easy to grasp, basic color scheme, good use of negative space.
Bad example: http://www.slideshare.net/inscit2006/visual-analysis-of-concept-change-and-information-diffusion
Very busy, convoluted, small font, too much info on page
example of above average presentation (not exemplary or extraordinarily good, but…)
http://www.slideshare.net/PrimalMedia/social-media-non-profits
Horrible!!!
http://www.slideshare.net/ralphpaglia/digital-dealer7-social-marketing-without-movies-v5
Rachael was my partner. :)
Elise & Tarja Slideshare Evaluation
Our “bad” example: http://www.slideshare.net/crosswaysfederation/music-videos-distribution-and-ownership
Why it’s bad:
- Too much copy
- Too monochromatic
- Nothing is highlighted; no clear focal points
- No visuals
- Rule of thirds is not evident
- Infographic slides are cluttered
Our “better” example: http://www.slideshare.net/crosswaysfederation/music-videos-distribution-and-ownership
Why it’s better:
- Easier to read
- Use of color
- Style is consistent
- Font choice is related to theme of the presentation, as are the graphics
Cathy and I looked at examples of presentations related to museum technologies (the focus of my research paper). It was pretty easy to find a bad one, and thankfully not too hard to find a good one.
First, the bad:
http://www.slideshare.net/Bronya/digital-mobile-technologies-and-museum-practice
This prime example of a “bad” presentation uses Comic Sans as the font (a graphic designer’s nightmare) throughout the presentation. It gets worse. Slide 2 is a mess of text with Easter egg-shaped bubbles making it look BUSY. While the majority of the other slides contain very little text (yay!) the Comic Sans font is set at various angles, almost enough to give the viewer a case of motion sickness.
And the good:
http://www.slideshare.net/ninaksimon/beyond-the-shiny-object-missiondriven-museum-technology-development
-Great clear images that tie in to the message
-Text is short and to the point
-Simple and looks like would add to rather than distract from the actual presentation
Group: thor, mandy, ruba
GOOD
http://www.slideshare.net/ciprian/ideas-on-how-to-create-powerful-presentations-1027429
BAD
http://www.slideshare.net/Frankwatching/microsoft-unified-communications-collaboration
Team Derrick and Eric:
Bad: http://www.slideshare.net/gleonhard/music-20-a-web-native-music-industry-by-gerd-leonhard
We found it to be far too busy and too colorful. We couldn’t concentrate on any of the slides and it just didn’t seem to flow properly.
Good: http://www.slideshare.net/corinnew/social-media-in-the-classroom-presentation
Good use of the rule of 1/3′s and it uses visuals well to illustrate each slide. Brevity wins with this one.
Elise & Tarja Correction…
Second link in the above comment should be: http://www.slideshare.net/y3dips/linux-security-interact-with-linux
Kathy,
From Zanna and Louise:
We thought this one is good in that each slide is not overwhelmed with text – there’s a fairly good balance of images and text. It’s doesn’t use thirds very well.
http://www.slideshare.net/irfan1612/radio-evolution-medium-a-tool-to-change-the-society –
We thought this one was worse: pretty dry visually; too many charts and graphics on one page. Too text heavy. Font size is small on some slides
http://www.slideshare.net/vamseet/emerging-market-needs-for-products
Teri and Jackie
Good:
http://www.slideshare.net/jamadrid/why-technology-is-failling-in-public-schools
Reasons:Engaging, good use of visuals, used rule of thirds, strong story and flow, and used color for emphasis.
Bad:
http://www.slideshare.net/AspireSystems/transforming-education-through-disruptive-technologies
Reasons: Small type, bullet overload, no storytelling, and lack of visuals
Another from Joanna and Mike!
I would say this one is slightly above average.
http://www.slideshare.net/nbrier/thinking-about-innovation
I’m not crazy about his placement or format of quotes on his slides, but I do appreciate his use of potent, relevant images. Sure, he’s got a few super ugly slides, but over all I think he’s headed towards a reasonable sensibility.