This page contains a chronological list of assignments and the topics we are covering each week as well as the readings.
- Class meets Wed, 6-10 pm in CMU126; our Twitter hashtag is #com546
- Office hours arranged by appointment; I can also be reached by cellphone (number distributed in-class the first evening)
- Follow me on Twitter @kegill_uw and I will return the follow for the duration of the quarter, enabling DMs. This account is a low-volume, classes-only account. Or you can follow my primary account, @kegill (this account does not have auto-follow enabled and is higher volume). Or neither one. :-)
Topics/Speakers/Due Dates
(subject to change)
Reading posts are due 9 am the day of class (there are five required). Reading schedule:
- One reading essay, weeks 2-3
- One reading essay, weeks 4-6
- One reading essay, weeks 7-8
- Questions: total of two sets, spread throughout the quarter, not the same week as the essay post
Week 1 – 6 January
Introductions, Class Overview
Class Notes | Post-Class Note
Week 2 – 13 January
History and Evolution of the Digital Age (and The Library)
Guest Speaker: Jessica Albano
Class Notes
Preliminary project idea due Tuesday 12 January at noon
(blog post; feedback given and points assigned)
Week 3 – 20 January
Frameworks and Theories: Thinking About the Internet
Class Notes – Post-class Note
Final project idea due Tuesday 19 January at noon
(blog post; feedback given and points assigned)
Week 4 – 27 January
Frameworks and Theories: Diffusion and Adoption
Class Notes |
Book review due Friday 29 January at noon Monday 1 February at noon
(choose from selected list; try to pick a book that will relate to your project)
Week 5 – 3 February
We’ve Been Down This Road Before: From The Telegraph To The Radio
Class Notes | Post-Class Note
Group 1 Leads Discussion
We will discuss books as well
Preliminary annotated bibliography due Friday 5 February at noon
Week 6 – 10 February
From Mass Communication To Customized Information
Class Notes | Post-Class Note
Group 2 Leads Discussion
Guest Speaker: Kevin O’Keefe, LexBlog (@kevinokeefe)
First paper (historical review) due 12 February Monday 15 February at noon
(Collect-It document, feedback given and points assigned)
Week 7 – 17 February
Frameworks and Theories: Computer-Mediated Communication and Hypertext
Class Notes | Post-Class Note
Group 3 Leads Discussion
Guest Speaker: Tac Anderson, Waggener Edstron (@tacanderson)
Week 8 – 24 February
Thinking About The Future
Class Notes – Post-class Notes
Group 4 Leads Discussion
Guest Speaker: Doug Rowan, Imaging Solutions (former CEO of Corbis)
Draft presentation due Friday, 26 February, noon
(Presentation: Collect-It, feedback given and points assigned)
Week 9 – 3 March
Thinking About The Future
Group 5 Leads Discussion
Guest Speaker: Renay San Miguel (@primomedia), technology journalist
Student Presentations
Class Notes
Second paper (present/future) due Friday 5 March, noon
(Paper: Collect-It document, feedback given and points assigned)
Week 10 – 10 March
Student Presentations
Class Notes
Finals Week – 17 March (6 pm)
Final (revised) paper due with complete annotated bibliography Wednesday 17 March at 6 pm; submit via Catalyst CollectIt
Projects will be published as stand-alone WordPress websites; final presentations will be published on Slideshare.net
Readings
Reading posts are due 9 am the day of class (there are five required).
(1) Reading reflections (see details on how these are evaluated) are due are due 9 am the day of class unless otherwise noted.
(2) Students will lead discussion (see details on how discussion leadership is evaluated) related to assigned readings once each quarter, beginning week five.
(3) Students will review a book that provides a historical perspective of a communication technology.
Unless otherwise noted, readings are available in eReserve or are in the required books. (Readings may be adjusted after week 1 to reflect student interests.)
- Week 2 – Due 13 January
- Week 3 – Due 20 January
- Week 4 – Due 27 January
- Week 5 – Due 3 February
- Week 6 – Due 10 February
- Week 7 – Due 17 February
- Week 8 – Due 24 February
Week 2 – Due 13 January at 9 am
History and Evolution of the Digital Age
- Everyone: Winston, Media Technology and Society – “Introduction” and “Part 1″ (required book)
- Everyone: Lessig – Chapter 2 of “Code” – Four Puzzles From Cyberspace (pdf is of the entire book)
Week 3 – Due 20 January at 9 am
Frameworks and Theories: Thinking About the Internet
- Everyone: Christensen, Seeing What’s Next – Part 1 – Using Theory to Analyze (required book)
- Everyone: Chapter 18 from Winston
- Optional: “Determining Uses and Gratifications for the Internet,” from Decision Sciences, Vol 35 No 2, March 2004. From eReserve or http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3713/is_200404/ai_n9398988
Week 4 – Due 27 January at 9 am
Frameworks and Theories: Diffusion and Adoption
- Everyone: Christensen, “Disruptive Technologies: Catching The Wave” (original HBR article, 1995, eReserve)
- Everyone: Chapter 5 from Rogers (eReserve)
- Everyone: Chapters 9-12 from Winston
Week 5 – Due 3 February at 9 am
We’ve Been Down This Road Before: From The Telegraph To The Radio
- Everyone: “As We May Think,” by Vannevar Bush from The Atlantic Monthly, July 1945.
- Everyone: Christensen, “Whither Moore’s Law” (Ch 7)
- Everyone: Chapter 13 from Winston
- Discussion Group Group 1 also reads one of these articles:
(1) McLuhan, M. (1964). The Medium Is The Message in Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. eReserve
(2) Williams, F., Strover, S. and Grant, A. E. (1994). Social aspects of new media technologies. In J. Bryant J. & D. Zillmann (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 463-482). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. eReserve
(3) Haridakis, P. and Hanson, G. (2009). Social interaction and co-viewing with YouTube: blending mass communication reception and social connection. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 53:2 (eReserve) - Discussion Group 1 – each group member is encouraged to incorporate additional external resources into the discussion — YouTube clips, current news articles, scholarly references
Week 6 – Due 10 February at 9 am
From Mass Communication To Customized Information
- Everyone: Fidler, Technologies of the Third Mediamorphosis (eReserve)
- Everyone: Benkler, The Trouble With Mass Media (Chapter 6)
- Discussion Group 2 also reads one of these articles:
(1) “Communication Technologies and Social Control” in A Social History of American Technology by Cowan (eReserve)
(2) “Lightening Lines and the Birth of Modern Communication, 1838-1900″ in Media and the American Mind From Morse to McLuhan by Czitrom (eReserve)
(3) Motivators for the intention to use mobile TV: a comparison of South Korean males and females. 2009. (eReserve) - Discussion Group 2 – each group member is encouraged to incorporate additional external resources into the discussion — YouTube clips, current news articles, scholarly references
Week 7 – Due 17 February at 9 am
Frameworks and Theories: Computer-Mediated Communication and Hypertext
- Everyone: “Around the World Wide Web in 80 Ways: how motives for going online are linked to internet activities among politically interested internet users,” from Social Science Computer Review, Vol 21 Issue 3, 2003.
- Everyone: “The Tragedy of the Commons” by Garret Hardin from Science Magazine (1968).
- Discussion Group 3 also reads one of these articles:
(1) “Principles of New Media” from The Language of New Media by Lev Manovich (2001) eReserve
(2) Nye, D.E. (2006). Technology and the Production of Difference. American Quarterly, 58(3), 597-618,983. Research Library database. (Document ID: 1144471241). eReserve
(3) Johnson, M. et al. (2008). Reinventing Your Business Model. Harvard Business Review. eReserve - Discussion Group 3 – each group member is encouraged to incorporate additional external resources into the discussion — YouTube clips, current news articles, scholarly references
Week 8 – Due 24 February at 9 am
Thinking About The Future
- Everyone: “Afterword: Media Monopoly” (1997)
- Everyone: Archivists struggle to preserve crucial records as paper gives way to pixels, http://chronicle.com/free/99/10/99101501t.htm
- Everyone: Christensen – Breaking The Wire (Ch 10)
- Extra-Credit Reading (stand-alone blog post): Social Aspects of New Media Technologies (eReserve)
- Discussion Group 4 also reads one of these articles:
(1) The New Age of Ego-Casting in The New Atlantis (Fall 2004- Winter 2005)
(2) Whose Space? Differences Among Users and Non-Users of Social Network Sites in Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication (2007)
(3) How Do People Really Seek Out Information About Others in in Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication (2008) - Discussion Group Group 4 – each group member is encouraged to incorporate additional external resources into the discussion — YouTube clips, current news articles, scholarly references
- Bonus (optional) resource:
Riede, E. et al. (2003). The role of the Internet in national and local news media use. Journal of Online Behavior, 1(3). http://www.behavior.net/JOB/v1n3/riedel.html
Week 9 – 3 March
Thinking About The Future
- Everyone: Christensen, Conclusion and Summary of Key Concepts
- Discussion Group 5 also reads one of these articles (offiste, requires UW login to library)
(1) Diez, E. and McIntosh, B.S. (May 2009). A review of the factors which influence the use and usefulness of information systems. Environmental Monitoring & Software 24(5). doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2008.10.009
(2) van de Wijngaert, L. and Bouwman, H. (2009). Would you share? Predicting the potential use of a new technology. Telematics and Informatics. doi:10.1016/j.tele.2008.01.002
(3) Yung, Y. et al. (2009). Consumer adoption of mobile TV: Examining psychological flow and medianext term content. Computers in Human Behavior 25(1). doi:10.1016/j.chb.2008.07.011
(4) Riley-Huff, D. A. (2009). Web Services As Public Services: Are We Supporting Our Busiest Service Point? Journal of Academic Librarianship 35(1). doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2008.10.004 - Discussion Group 5 – each group member is encouraged to incorporate additional external resources into the discussion — YouTube clips, current news articles, scholarly references
- Extra-Credit Reading (stand-alone blog post): Effects of gratification-opportunities and gratifications-obtained on preferences of instant messaging and e-mail among college students. Telematics and Informatics, May 2009. doi:10.1016/j.tele.2008.06.001
Assignment Details
Students will prepare a written reading reflection at least three times during the quarter. These mini-essays (approximately 500-600 words) should be posted to the student blog before 9 am the day of class. They should be substantive, be spell-checked, and integrate readings with real life experience/observation. They should be distributed throughout the quarter. Two other weeks, students should post three open-ended discussion questions triggered by the required readings. These posts are due by 9 am the day of class.
- There should be at least one reflection post during weeks 2-3
- There should be at least one reflection post during weeks 4-6
- There should be at least one reflection post during weeks 7-8
- Two question posts required. Students who complete three question posts will receive extra credit. Remember, question posts are contributed on a reading where you do not provide an essay and should be spread among the three time periods.
Reading examples and assessment criteria
Criteria: Does the reflection go beyond a summary to link the article(s) to course material and/or student research or work experience? Is the material posted in a timely manner and free of grammatical errors? In the discussion question post, are there three open-ended questions? [Reminder: an open-ended question cannot be answered with a one-word, yes-or-no answer.]
To conform with the blogging genre, remember to categorize the blog post “reading reflection” or “com546 reading reflection.”
Discussion Groups:
1. (3 Feb) Dean, Helen, Nicole M, Scott
2. (10 Feb) Elizabeth, Inge, Katia, Nicole C, Xurxo
3. (17 Feb) Anna, Erika, Marc, Melissa, Rose
4. (24 Feb) Antika, Janna, Lynne, Sam, Stephen
5. (3 Mar) Danielle, John, Lisa, Shelby
Each student will lead discussion one class session during the quarter. Discussion leaders are assigned an article in the reading list and should (1) link the article to personal experience, their research project, and/or current business practices as well as (2) link it to the general class reading, comparing and contrasting viewpoints. Students are encouraged to also find external material related to their individual interests.
Because of the size of the class, there will be more than one presentation each evening. Students will be divided into five work teams; each member of the team will lead a structured small group discussion.
Each presentation and question session will be about 10 minutes. It’s much harder to give an effective short presentation than a long one. See these two examples!
Excerpt from remarks by Andor C. Klay upon receiving the Abraham Lincoln Award of the American Hungarian Federation, Nov. 24:
[Tividar Kohanyi, editor of the largest American newspaper in Hungarian language asked President William Howard Taft to speak at a banquet:]
”Just a brief one, Mr. President, since we can imagine how busy you must be – perhaps five minutes.” The President smiled and declined: ”Do you realize my friends, that to prepare even a five-minute speech would take several hours to plan, to draft, to rewrite, to pass through channels for clearances? I’m afraid that I just haven’t got the time.”
Kohanyi pressed: ”Well, as far as that goes, we would be delighted to have you speak for an hour.” The monumental body of the heaviest statesman of his time straightened up: ”Gentlemen, I am ready, now!”
***
If I am to speak ten minutes, I need a week for preparation; if fifteen minutes, three days; if half an hour, two days; if an hour, I am ready now.
As quoted in The Wilson Era; Years of War and After, 1917–1923 (1946) by Josephus Daniels, p. 624. Referenced in Bartleby.com
The discussion leaders will provide a written analysis on the student blog prior to class, thus contributing to the public discussion of issues raised by this course. In asynchronous communication — and to practice one of the technologies we are discussing — students are encouraged to comment on these posts. For students who are not comfortable speaking up in class, providing written comment is another form of class participation.
Discussion leaders should also prepare a Powerpoint presentation that is uploaded to Slideshare.net. This slide deck should contain no more than five content slides (plus a title slide and a credit slide). After leading discussion, for extra credit (25 points) students may post a reflection on the experience within two days after class.
Examples and assessment criteria
- Principles of New Media (post-discussion reflection)
- Principles of New Media (post-discussion reflection)
- Technology & Community (includes post-discussion reflection)
- Community and Communication (post-discussion reflection)
Criteria: Does the pre-class analysis contain a proper citation (so that others may find the article)? Is the analysis written clearly and succinctly and meet the guidelines in this section? In the presentation, does the discussion leader go beyond a summary to link the article to course material and/or their research or work experience? Is the material posted in a timely manner and free of grammatical errors? How creatively does the student explore the topic?
These discussion leadership opportunities will occur Weeks 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9.
Book Reviews
In 800-1,000 words, complete a critical review of a book of your choice (from the list). These books are selected to provide students with a historical perspective of a social aspect of communication technology. What will determine your grade will not be the position you take (to endorse or criticize the book). What is more important is the rigor (evidence) with which you support your opinion.
Book reviews are submitted on the student blog, thus contributing to the public discussion of issues raised by the books. If you would like to create an alternative review, such as a video review on YouTube, talk to (pitch) me!
Due Friday 29 January @ 5 pm; post to your course blog.
All 2009 book reviews; all 2010 book reviews.
Select from one of these books:
- A Nation Transformed By Information (2000), A.D. Chandler, Jr and J.W. Cortada
- Being Digital (1996), N. Negroponte (see excerpts, Amazon)
- The Cluetrain Manifesto (1999), C. Locke et al (Amazon, online)
- Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace (2000), L. Lessig (Amazon)
- The Creation of The Media: Political Origins of Modern Communications (2004 ), P. Starr (Amazon)
- Dealers of Lightning: Xerox PARC and The Dawn of the Computer Age (1999), M.A. Hiltzik (Amazon)
- A History of Broadcasting in the United States, Vol 1 – Tower of Babel through 1933, E. Barnouw. (GoogleBooks)
- Neuromancer (1984), W. Gibson [fiction]
- Peer-to-Peer: Harnessing the Power of Disruptive Technologies (2001), A. Oram (Amazon)
- Rainbows End (2006), V. Vinge [fiction]
- Six Degrees (2003 HB/2004 PB), Duncan J. Watts
- Smart Mobs (2002), H. Rheingold
- The Social Life of Information (2000), J.S. Brown and P. Duguid
- Telephone: The First One Hundred Years (1975 or 1976), J. Brooks
- The Transparent Society (1998), D. Brin
- The Victorian Internet: The Remarkable Story of the Telegraph and the Nineteenth Century’s On-line Pioneers (1998 or 2007), T. Standage (Amazon)
- The Virtual Community: Homesteading on The Electronic Frontier (2000), H. Rheingold
- We The Media (2004), D. Gillmor (online book)
Book review examples (some are NOT on the list – they are examples of good books) and assessment criteria (google doc)
2 Replies
[...] http://com546.wordpress.com/schedule/#assessment_review [...]
[...] Discussion Group 1 : Dean, Helen, Nicole M, Scott Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)Week 2 Post-Class Notes [...]